Some SMB owners experience issues on a regular basis not realizing that they have been approaching a recurring problem with a less-than-ideal strategy for years. Some drown in work, some have constant workmanship issues, some have problems with employees, some have financial challenges, and some have all of these simultaneously. Getting help is the obvious step before a more serious issue like a burnout hits. When an owner finally decides to get help, the major challenge is identifying the right problem to fix. And for that, the discovery and diagnosis phase is needed.
At Mondro, we use a proprietary approach to discovery, diagnosis, and problem solving called IDEAS™. IDEAS™ stands for Interviews, Data, Examination, Artefacts, and Synthesis. During the first discussion with a client, our advisors will ask several relevant questions and gather as much information as possible before doing a preliminary diagnosis. And although some insights may result from this first session, it is never sufficient to have a complete understanding of the problem. To be able to correctly define what solution, digital or other, is needed in a business, a more complete IDEAS™ is necessary.
According to The Alternative Board,
of business owners' time is spent working “in” their business—tackling day-to-day tasks, putting out fires, etc. Only
of their time is spent working “on” their business—i.e. long-term goals, strategic planning. Yet;
of business owners would prefer working “on” their business rather than “in” their business. And since
of business owner's time is seen as wasted on administrative tasks, Mondro can make a huge difference.
Prior the first discussion, Mondro will send a fairly extensive survey to gather some standard information on the business. This allows the advisor to correctly prepare for the first face-to-face discussion. After the survey has been completed, the first meeting is usually an interview to understand at a high level what the problems are. However, even after the survey and first discussion, several additional interview sessions and surveys will be necessary with additional business stakeholders.
Even with interviews and discussions, it is usually not possible to have an unbiased understanding of the current state. People usually color their response with their perspectives, hence the need to additional information. Data in the form of databases and spreadsheet can provide some of this insight. If the business is already equipped with some digital tools, extracting data from those tools should be fairly straightforward. Applying sensible analytics on this set of data can provide valuable information as to what is going on.
Both interviews and data gathering are somewhat slow and passive methods. And even with the two first methods, some key insights may be missed. For instance, a worker who uses a shortcut to produce a part but is ashamed of not complying to standard procedures. This information will be included neither in interviews nor extracted data. Therefore, conducing a few examination exercises by observing and walking processes will further the understanding.
And as a final key input to discovery, the artefacts of the business should be investigated. Mondro defines business artefacts as all physical or digital evidence of the work performed at the company not contained in the first three inputs. This can be comprised of documents, contracts, process maps, business cases, SOPs, logs, and various others.
Once all the different inputs are gathered, an analysis is performed making sure that all the dots are correctly connected. The Synthesis step is of course necessary to ensure information and insights are extracted for all the different inputs gathered. Once the synthesis is done correctly, potential improvements and requirements will emerge naturally, making the next step significantly easier.